Adultery and inappropriate relationships among the ranks in the Army Research Paper

Adultery and inappropriate relationships among the ranks in the Army - query newspaper publisher ExampleFemale and male veterans be reported to confirm reports of rampant sexual trauma during their return in the war machine. The military has been reluctant to take action against these allegations. Military officials are said to take aim have over 3000 reports on sexual assault in the year 2011. However, reports indicate that only 191 cases have successfully been convicted in the court-martial. This has encouraged the outrageous behavior in the military circles. No wonder, the majority sexual predators are repeat offenders. Sexual assailants in the military are said to be unaware of the impact of their actions to the lives of the victims. This quiz seeks to explore the issue of adultery and inappropriate relationships among ranks in the military. Many commonwealth believe that sexual ethics in the military fall under personal choices and should never be governed by the milit ary. Research shows that nigh people believe that extramarital affairs should not be punishable in the military. A crownwork indicated that 49 percent of Americans believe that adultery should be allowed in the military. The argument in based on the fact that adultery is a personal choice regardless to whether it is right or wrong. Most of the people who back adultery in the military use the natural law theory (Mitchell, 1998). The argument suggests that the means of having sexual urges is to explore sexual relationships with multiple partners (Brinson, 2008). The natural law suggests that it is natural to fulfill the sexual urges and desires. aggregate cases have been reported dealing with cases of immorality in the military. Army major John Lonhouser, Air fight General Joseph Ralston and General David Petraus are representative of what is happening in the top ranks of the United States military. The junior rank soldiery imagine that the drill sergeants live in an insular wor ld. The junior officers believe the word from their commanders is final. As a result, they suffer from rape and sexual assaults while serving in the United States military. Most of these troops suffer retaliation after reporting these cases (Brinson, 2008). Sexual assaults have resulted to demoralization of the United States military, especially those who have fallen victims. The military is expected to be a moral leader in the United States. Research indicates that there is a culture of condoning military adultery and improper sexual relationships in the units of the United States army. However, the rules slant to be different for the generals (Mitchell, 1998). According research, consensual sex seems to be widely tolerated in the United States army. The media seems to pose top generals into limelight. However, the military structures, culture and attitude is accustomed to sexual offences (Valente & Wight). Soldiers are known to work in extreme conditions (Brinson, 2008). They sp end most long period of time away from their families. This has been attributed to the multiple cases of adultery in improper relationships among the ranks in the army. The department of defense has conducted large-scale surveys with regard to adultery and improper relationships in the soaring guards, Marine Corps, navy army and air force active-duty personnel (Mitchell, 1998). Research confirms the women and men experience gender-related favouritism which has been in the rise in the last one decade. For long, sexual harassment had been termed as a enigma facing the military women. However, men are increasingly becoming targets of improper relationships at an alarming rate. The military culture and gender based imbalances while on active duty have been cited as close to of the causes of adultery and improper relationships among the military personnel. The military environment provides the sexual offenders